<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cuil, and its Lukewarm Debut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ariyam.com/2008/07/29/cuil-kul-its-lukewarm-debut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ariyam.com/2008/07/29/cuil-kul-its-lukewarm-debut/</link>
	<description>and babblings!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:04:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: d</title>
		<link>http://www.ariyam.com/2008/07/29/cuil-kul-its-lukewarm-debut/#comment-76993</link>
		<dc:creator>d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ariyam.com/?p=220#comment-76993</guid>
		<description>Apparently you&#039;re not the only one who has total haterade for it. Here&#039;s a bit starker take on it from a long time ad man http://tinyurl.com/6ctukp

Also, the name? TOTALLY freaking lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently you&#8217;re not the only one who has total haterade for it. Here&#8217;s a bit starker take on it from a long time ad man <a href="http://tinyurl.com/6ctukp" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6ctukp</a></p>
<p>Also, the name? TOTALLY freaking lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.ariyam.com/2008/07/29/cuil-kul-its-lukewarm-debut/#comment-76990</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ariyam.com/?p=220#comment-76990</guid>
		<description>It seems to be about once a year that one of these new &#039;google killers&#039; comes out.  Every time they do, I begrudgingly give it a shot.  And without fail, I go right back to Google and forget about it.

The site didn&#039;t even work for half the searches I tried yesterday.  I got no results when I searched for Walden Pond (no quotes).  Yet, a second click with the same terms worked fine.  This happened a few times.  Obviously, they&#039;re new and the backend needs a little more support, but come on.  &quot;I was a bit hurt that my own website wasn’t indexed on cuil...&quot;  Actually, it is.  But that&#039;s just another example of the site not working properly.  

And speaking of new, what&#039;s up with the amount of unwarranted PR these things always generate.  It kind of pisses me off.  I had Mark Laboss - a guy who I can&#039;t even get to read my emails sometimes - ask me if I tried it yet, less than 24 hours after it comes out.  The publicity reach for a brand new product that most people actually felt kind of &#039;eh&#039; about is more amazing than the site itself.

Like it always has, Google just works and it works well.  That&#039;s all I&#039;m looking for in a search engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to be about once a year that one of these new &#8216;google killers&#8217; comes out.  Every time they do, I begrudgingly give it a shot.  And without fail, I go right back to Google and forget about it.</p>
<p>The site didn&#8217;t even work for half the searches I tried yesterday.  I got no results when I searched for Walden Pond (no quotes).  Yet, a second click with the same terms worked fine.  This happened a few times.  Obviously, they&#8217;re new and the backend needs a little more support, but come on.  &#8220;I was a bit hurt that my own website wasn’t indexed on cuil&#8230;&#8221;  Actually, it is.  But that&#8217;s just another example of the site not working properly.  </p>
<p>And speaking of new, what&#8217;s up with the amount of unwarranted PR these things always generate.  It kind of pisses me off.  I had Mark Laboss &#8211; a guy who I can&#8217;t even get to read my emails sometimes &#8211; ask me if I tried it yet, less than 24 hours after it comes out.  The publicity reach for a brand new product that most people actually felt kind of &#8216;eh&#8217; about is more amazing than the site itself.</p>
<p>Like it always has, Google just works and it works well.  That&#8217;s all I&#8217;m looking for in a search engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

